The 2026 Barclay Simpson Salary Survey & Recruitment Trends Guide: Compliance

Barclay Simpson has been producing market reports across the areas we recruit for since 1990. For the 2026 edition of our Salary Survey and Recruitment Trends Guide for the compliance market, we surveyed both employers and compliance professionals to gather their views on the issues affecting their industry and profession.
This includes trends affecting permanent jobs and contract jobs, as well as wider developments shaping the compliance market, such as artificial intelligence and equality, diversity and inclusion. We also examine current salary trends and provide the latest salary ranges for job roles across the compliance profession.
Compliance permanent jobs market
The compliance recruitment market has been more active over the last 12 months, albeit only moderately so, and it is still some way off its most recent hiring peak during the post-pandemic period.
Hiring across compliance jobs was relatively consistent throughout 2025, although it failed to build meaningful momentum after a subdued 2024. Underlying demand was also offset by the offshoring and nearshoring of jobs to cut costs, along with some redundancies and hiring reductions at large firms. That said, smaller fintech and payments firms continue to generate demand for compliance professionals. As these firms scale or seek FCA authorisation, they are typically required to appoint experienced compliance leaders, such as Heads of Compliance or MLROs.
Consumer Duty remains one of the few areas where the FCA has materially increased supervisory attention, which has led to some targeted hiring. However, the broader regulatory environment has been relatively quiet compared with the immediate post-pandemic years.
“The market has improved over the last year, but there are still several factors preventing hiring from hitting its stride,” says Nick Evans, Executive Consultant, Compliance, at Barclay Simpson.
“Much of the economic and political backdrop remains uncertain, and the FCA has announced it will be ‘rebalancing‘ its approach to risk to focus more on growth. A deregulatory policy environment can also limit the urgency behind compliance hiring, as firms face fewer immediate regulatory change projects and reduced pressure to expand oversight functions.”
The regulator’s comments come at a time when both the UK and the US are looking to cut red tape in an effort to boost their respective economies. One measure that has already been announced in the UK is the abolishment of the Payment Systems Regulator, with the FCA expected to take on its responsibilities.
Against this backdrop, enforcement activity has also eased. Last year, the FCA levied £124 million in penalties, which is down from £176 million in 2024 and considerably lower than the near £570 million handed down in 2021.
FCA Fines
Source: FCA
Fines and sanctions are a strong driver of compliance hiring, and when these are limited, suppressed demand typically follows. However, as we mentioned in our 2025 Salary Survey report, compliance recruitment is highly cyclical.
Adding headcount is often prioritised when firms must pay big, headline-hitting fines. Compliance teams are subsequently bolstered, the problem is addressed, and then, once trading dips, this resource is released. Over time, compliance teams become under-resourced, new problems emerge and the cycle starts again.
Are staff shortages affecting the performance of your teams?
Many organisations are already telling us that their teams are stretched. According to our annual Employer Survey, 61% of firms that hire compliance and financial crime professionals believe staff shortages are currently affecting the performance of their teams. Of these, 11% say the impact is significant.
Barriers to hiring
Looking ahead to the remainder of this year, employers’ hiring intentions have improved since our last report, though not by a large margin. Currently, 61% of organisations say they will likely recruit additional staff in 2026, up from 58% year on year.
And while candidate availability is reasonably high at the moment, 93% of organisations tell us they are still finding it challenging to hire the right people in the current market. Of these, almost a third (32%) say it is ‘very challenging’.
How likely are you to hire additional staff in 2026?
How challenging is it to find skilled talent in today’s market?
Nearly three-quarters (73%) of respondents mentioned issues around compensation as a key problem they face, making it the most frequently cited complaint. More than six out of 10 (61%) feel candidates showed insufficient technical or regulatory knowledge, although this was slightly lower than the 68% who said the same in our last report.
The most notable trend was the rise in employers who told us that finding people who were the right cultural fit for their organisation was a challenge. This figure has nearly doubled from 24% in 2024 to 46% now. Almost a third (31%) of respondents also cited their remote working policies as a problem, with 39% admitting their current approach is causing recruitment and retention problems.
Top five recruitment challenges in compliance
| Recruitment challenge | % of employers |
|---|---|
| Compensation | 73% |
| Insufficient technical/regulatory knowledge | 61% |
| Poor culture fit | 46% |
| Remote working | 31% |
| Office location | 12% |
Respondents could select all options that applied
Candidates face various challenges
Compliance professionals are less optimistic about their career options than last year. In our latest Candidate Survey, more than a quarter (26%) of respondents said they were ‘not at all’ confident with the current state of the jobs market. This figure has nearly doubled from 14% in our previous report, and is up significantly from just 4% in 2022.
When asked what the greatest challenges are, a lack of jobs being advertised was the most common answer (44% of candidates). However, hesitancy to move from a current role (40%), salaries and day rates being too low (36%) and challenging recruitment processes (34%) were also frequently mentioned.
“It’s been a pretty tough year for buy-side compliance teams in particular,” says James Boxall, Principal Consultant for Compliance, at Barclay Simpson.
“Budgets are being scaled back and redundancies have been an unfortunate reality. There’s a lot of competition for roles, and recruitment processes can be quite slow, which is frustrating for candidates.”
How confident are you in the current job market?
What are the biggest challenges to securing a new role at the moment?
| Candidate challenges | % of candidates |
|---|---|
| Too few jobs being advertised | 44% |
| Hesitant to move from current role | 40% |
| Advertised salaries or day rates are too low | 36% |
| Challenging recruitment processes | 34% |
| Other | 5% |
Respondents could select all options that applied.
Contract jobs in compliance
After a relatively strong start to the year in 2025, activity within the compliance contract jobs market petered out as the year progressed. In many ways, contract recruitment mirrored permanent jobs, with redundancies, outsourcing and a quiet regulatory environment combining to suppress demand.
“The first quarter of last year was busy, but this momentum didn’t carry through to the rest of 2025 and we are seeing fewer of the transformation projects that would typically drive hiring,” says Michael Cunningham, Executive Consultant at Barclay Simpson.
“Operational compliance has been very quiet overall, and a number of big banks have begun to outsource functions to locations such as Poland and India to automate and cut costs.”
As mentioned earlier in this report, there has been some ongoing hiring around consumer duty regulations for retail firms, but on the whole it has not been a period in which a large amount of regulatory change is occurring. However, it is worth noting that contractors, temporary workers and co-source support remain a valued part of many compliance teams. Nearly three-quarters (72%) of organisations told us they regularly use interim support.
There has been a decline in the proportion of employers hiring primarily for specific projects though (30% today, versus 46% in our last report), reflecting the slowdown in transformation programmes. Leveraging subject matter expertise, which was cited by 35% of organisations, is now the most common reason for using interim staff.
Primary reasons for using interim, contract or co-source staff
| Reason for using interim resource | 2025 (% of employers) | 2024 (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Leverage subject matter expertise | 35% | 11% |
| Specific projects | 30% | 46% |
| Absence cover | 15% | 11% |
| Keep permanent headcounts low | 10% | 11% |
| Inability to source permanent employees / candidates | 5% | 7% |
| Support BAU due to increased workloads | 5% | 14% |
Fixed-term contracts (FTCs) have also become increasingly common over the last year. In 2024, a third of interim employees in compliance roles said they were on FTCs. This figure has since climbed to 50% and it is now the most frequently cited contract arrangement.
Interestingly, contractor preferences appear to be shifting as well. Last year, ‘outside IR35’ agreements were the most popular type of contract among candidates, but they have now fallen behind FTCs in order of preference.
FTCs have historically been unpopular with candidates because they do not offer either the long-term job security of a permanent role, nor the financial incentives of traditional contracting. That said, it is possible that in an uncertain market with fewer opportunities across both permanent and contract jobs, compliance professionals view FTCs as offering at least short- to medium-term stability.
What type of contracting arrangement do candidates most prefer?
2025
2024
AI in compliance recruitment
Last year, the UK Government announced a number of major reforms aimed at driving growth, creating jobs and boosting British businesses by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI).
OECD estimates suggest that AI could improve productivity in the UK by up to 1.2 percentage points every year over the next decade, second only to the US in the G7. Increasing AI adoption within organisations could also unlock as much as £140 billion in annual economic output.
In this, our 2026 Compliance Salary Survey and Recruitment Trends Guide, we explore how AI is influencing the profession, both in the day-to-day operation of teams and across compliance recruitment.
AI helping to automate compliance
Last year, 71% of executives in a PwC poll said they were confident that AI would have a positive impact on compliance functions. The technology has already been widely adopted to automate routine tasks and processes across regulatory management, transaction monitoring, fraud detection and communications surveillance.
Top 5 use cases for AI in compliance
| AI use cases | % of organisations |
|---|---|
| Summarising documents | 88% |
| Reviewing documents in investigations | 85% |
| Risk assessments | 83% |
| Regulatory updates | 70% |
| Third-party transaction monitoring | 53% |
“Automation has been a hot topic for as long as I’ve recruited into compliance, and AI is making it a lot easier for the function to automate lower-level tasks,” says James Boxall, Principal Consultant for Compliance, at Barclay Simpson.
“On the buy-side, many organisations are building their own tools because the cost of going to an AI supplier remains high. But AI is definitely having an impact on compliance functions.”
What is your organisation’s motivation for using AI?
| Reason | % of organisations |
|---|---|
| Time savings | 73% |
| Cost savings | 71% |
| Allows compliance personnel to focus on other tasks | 64% |
| Regulator guidance | 48% |
| Peer businesses are adopting AI | 21% |
While adoption is on the rise, a majority of compliance departments still don’t use AI. According to White & Case figures, just over a third (36%) of teams worldwide use AI for both investigations and compliance processes. A further 23% don’t currently use AI, but have plans to utilise it in the future.
Compliance professionals sceptical of AI in recruitment
AI may be taking the world by storm, but it appears that both organisations and candidates have reservations about how the technology is used when it comes to job applications and hiring.
Our surveys show that 72% of compliance professionals believe AI worsens recruitment processes. Candidates also expressed reservations about using AI themselves during the job application process, with only 30% having done so to improve their chances of securing a role. When asked what impact AI has overall, more than half (54%) claimed that AI neither makes recruitment processes more efficient nor more effective. Only a minority (12%) believe it achieves both.
What impact does AI have on recruitment processes?
Employers
Candidates
Employers were even more sceptical. More than two-thirds (68%) don’t currently use it in their processes, and 68% agreed with candidates that it makes recruitment neither more efficient nor more effective.
Of the organisations currently utilising AI in their recruitment, it was most commonly used for interview support, such as transcribing and analysing interviews (75%). Writing and targeting job adverts (63%) and CV screening and shortlisting (38%) were also frequently cited activities. However, a third (33%) of employers view AI as a threat to their recruitment processes. The biggest concerns centred around the integrity of information provided on CVs (93%), the quality of candidate sourcing and selection (64%) and AI-enabled impersonation (43%).
What concerns you most about AI’s impact in recruitment?
| Concern | % of employers |
|---|---|
| Integrity of information on CVs | 93% |
| Quality of candidate sourcing and selection | 64% |
| AI-enabled impersonation | 43% |
| Integrity of interviews | 29% |
Respondents could select all options that applied.
Have you used AI to improve your chances during a job application? (Candidates)
Equality, diversity and inclusion in compliance
At Barclay Simpson, we are committed to building diverse and inclusive workplaces where everyone’s contributions are respected and valued. Recruiters are in a unique position to promote the benefits of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) within the world of employment, and we believe agencies should not only embrace these values internally, but also promote and support them across their wider communities.
This is now our second year of collecting EDI-focused data from our annual market report surveys, allowing us to provide year-on-year comparisons and draw deeper insights from our communities on these important issues.
Organisations scale back EDI initiatives
When US President Donald Trump took office last year, he immediately signed Executive Orders to revoke long-standing affirmative action programmes for federal contractors and organisations that receive government funding. Many large US-headquartered firms have since scaled back or abandoned EDI initiatives and targets, including Meta, McDonald’s, Walmart, IBM and Goldman Sachs.
Recent research from law firm Freeths has revealed that more and more organisations in the UK are following suit. While affirmative action policies are prohibited under the country’s Equality Act 2010, Freeths found that 54% of businesses have shifted their approach to ethical policies nonetheless, making them less of a priority. According to the research, 28% of surveyed organisations had either “scaled back or dropped” certain EDI-led efforts and sustainability initiatives.
In a recent EY report on the role of EDI in boosting productivity and talent, Sir Trevor Phillips, Chair of Change the Race Ratio, said: “Both workforces and customers are more diverse, and more aware of their differences than ever. That means studying what has been done, dropping approaches that failed to deliver, and doubling down on programmes that boost corporate success.”
In March last year, the FCA also announced that it would not be pursuing stricter rules on EDI in financial services, despite submitting proposals in 2023 aimed at improving diversity and inclusion at regulated firms. The FCA cited compliance costs and concerns over duplicating existing government regulations as reasons.
“The FCA stands by its previously implemented policies on EDI, but it doesn’t look like it’ll be introducing any new reporting requirements for firms,” says Nick Evans, Executive Consultant, Compliance, at Barclay Simpson.
“While organisations still demonstrate a strong commitment to diversity and inclusion, there has been less of a focus on EDI-led recruitment over the last couple of years.”
This is supported by our data. Notably, the vast majority (93%) of employers we surveyed said they believe EDI is important to attracting and retaining good candidates. Of these, 57% say it is very important.
How important do you think EDI is for attracting/retaining good candidates?
Compliance professionals still value EDI
While organisations may be less vocal on EDI, our surveys nevertheless show that it still matters to both compliance professionals and the businesses that employ them.
When candidates and employers were asked how they felt about EDI, 87% of professionals and 96% of organisations said it was important to them personally. The figure for employers is actually higher than in our previous report (87%), despite the recent scaling back of EDI initiatives, and only slightly lower for professionals (89% in 2024).
How important is EDI to you personally?
Candidates
Employers
More than six out of every 10 employees (62%) also agree that their organisation shows a strong commitment to EDI, with only 13% disagreeing. Unfortunately, people are less convinced that their company’s approach to diversity and inclusion is making a real difference — 41% were neutral on how impactful EDI initiatives are.
Organisations themselves are more optimistic, with 57% believing they have created an effective culture around EDI. That said, nearly a third (32%) were also neutral on their effectiveness in this area, suggesting there is still some room for improvement on turning words into action.
My organisation’s commitment to EDI makes a real difference (Candidates)
My organisation has an effective culture of EDI (Employers)
When asked what the most challenging aspect of creating a diverse and inclusive culture is, 42% said having better representation among leadership and board-level roles. Motivating stakeholders (14%), building a fair hiring process (11%) and accessing EDI-skilled HR resource were also considered significant hurdles.
What is the biggest challenge your company faces in creating a diverse and inclusive culture?
| EDI challenges | % of employers |
|---|---|
| How to increase representation among leadership/board roles | 43% |
| Motivating stakeholders | 14% |
| Building a fair hiring process | 11% |
| Lack of access to EDI skilled HR resource | 11% |
| Setting and tracking key performance indicators | 7% |
| Achieving pay equity | 7% |
| Insufficient employee EDI data | 7% |
For organisations serious about EDI, accessing accurate information and insights is crucial. Businesses have a better chance of fostering a sense of belonging and making a positive difference in the workplace by listening to both employees and experts who can provide input on what really matters when it comes to EDI.
If you would like to know more about any of the diversity-related findings in this report or the EDI advice and support we can provide, please contact us today.
Salary and bonus trends for compliance
Compliance starting salaries remained largely flat last year, and in real terms saw a slight decline as sluggishness in the jobs market dampened upward pressure on pay. Many candidates also reported that bonuses were lower in 2025.
The plateau in salary growth for compliance jobs is largely a product of greater candidate availability in the market due to restructuring and redundancies, as well as reluctance among professionals to switch jobs during a period of uncertainty.
“Salaries haven’t experienced a great deal of growth over the last 12 months, echoing a similarly muted year in 2024,” says Nick Evans, Executive Consultant, Compliance, at Barclay Simpson.
“Professionals already in stable roles are reluctant to move, wary of being the ‘last one in, first one out’ at another firm. However, hiring managers still have a lot of options because there are so many strong candidates in the market.”
Compliance professionals with the right skills and experience can nevertheless still achieve attractive salary uplifts in the current climate, with employers increasingly favouring those who have good business acumen in addition to key technical capabilities.
Looking ahead, base salaries for existing employees are likely to see only modest increases in 2026. According to our annual survey of employers within compliance and financial crime, 75% of organisations intend to raise salaries by an average of 1% to 4% over the next 12 months. This is broadly in line with last year.
A further 11% are aiming for 5-10% uplifts, while just 3% will offer 11%+. Bonuses are also expected to show little movement, with only 8% of employers anticipating higher payouts in 2026.
How much do you intend to increase base salaries for existing employees?
| Base salary increase | 2026 (% of employers) | 2025 (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0% | 10% | 8% |
| 1–4% | 75% | 76% |
| 5–10% | 11% | 11% |
| 11%+ | 3% | 5% |
Career progression competing with pay
Each year, we ask professionals in compliance jobs to rank the reasons why they would look for a new role in order of importance. Most years, remuneration is the biggest motivator, and this proved to be the case again in our latest Candidate Survey — but the gap between pay and other priorities is closing.
In 2024, more than half (54%) of respondents chose remuneration as their top priority, yet this figure has dropped to roughly a third (34%). Meanwhile, the proportion of compliance professionals choosing career development as their primary goal has jumped from 15% to 28%.
“A shift towards career development can be expected when the jobs market is somewhat subdued,” says Michael Cunningham, Executive Consultant at Barclay Simpson.
“Some candidates will have been in their current role for a few years, and the opportunity to move somewhere with clear long-term career prospects can be more attractive than marginal pay increases.”
We are also seeing more professionals cite job security as their primary concern (10% versus 7% in last year’s Compliance Salary Survey). This figure has steadily increased year on year from just 4% in 2022.
What is your main priority when considering a new role?
| Candidate priority | 2025 (% of candidates) | 2024 (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Remuneration | 34% | 54% |
| Career development | 28% | 15% |
| Work-life balance | 17% | 16% |
| Job security | 10% | 7% |
| Remote working | 9% | 8% |
| Better benefits | 1% | 1% |
The figures for a healthy work-life balance (chosen by 17% of candidates) and remote working (9%) were largely unchanged from last year. Nonetheless, remote working remains important to compliance professionals, with 47% saying it is the job benefit they value the most, while 10% chose flexible working.
Some 63% of candidates also claimed they would consider changing jobs if they couldn’t secure their preferred hybrid working set-up in their current role. Unfortunately, greater flexibility is increasingly at odds with what the market is offering. Organisations continue to expect more time in the office from employees, with 26% now requiring either four or five days a week on-site — up from 16% in 2024 and just 8% in 2023.
Left unresolved, the widening disconnect between expectation and reality on hybrid working risks becoming a growing source of frustration for both employers and candidates as 2026 unfolds.
Which job benefits do compliance professionals value the most?
Compliance salaries
The following tables provide an overview of current salary benchmarks for key roles across compliance. Figures reflect average base salaries and day rates for professionals across the UK, as well as those working remotely.
Corporate and investment banking salaries
| Job role | London | South East | Regional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance Assistant | £40k–£55k | £40k–£55k | £35k–£45k |
| Compliance AVP / Manager | £50k–£85k | £50k–£85k | £45k–£80k |
| Compliance VP / Senior Manager | £80k–£140k | £80k–£140k | £70k–£120k |
| Compliance Director | £160k–£190k | £150k–£180k | £130k–£160k |
| Compliance Executive Director | £160k–£220k | £160k–£220k | £160k–£220k |
| MD / Head of Compliance | £200k–£400k | £200k–£400k | £200k–£300k |
| Global Head of Compliance | £350k+ | £250k+ | £250k+ |
Retail banking salaries
| Job role | London | South East | Regional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance Assistant | £40k–£55k | £40k–£55k | £30k–£50k |
| Compliance AVP / Manager | £50k–£80k | £50k–£80k | £40k–£60k |
| Compliance VP / Senior Manager | £80k–£140k | £80k–£140k | £60k–£95k |
| Compliance Director | £90k–£180k | £90k–£180k | £85k–£140k |
| Head of Compliance | £150k–£250k | £150k–£250k | £140k–£200k |
| Global Head of Compliance | £200k–£350k | £200k+ | £200k+ |
Private banking salaries
| Job role | London | South East | Regional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance Assistant | £45k–£55k | £40k–£55k | £35k–£45k |
| Compliance AVP / Manager | £60k–£80k | £55k–£75k | £50k–£70k |
| Compliance VP / Senior Manager | £80k–£110k | £80k–£110k | £80k–£100k |
| Compliance Director | £120k–£180k | £120k–£160k | £100k–£150k |
| Head of Compliance | £150k–£250k | £140k–£250k | £120k–£200k |
| Global Head of Compliance | £250k–£500k | £200k+ | £150k+ |
Asset and wealth management salaries
| Job role | London | South East | Regional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance Assistant | £45k–£55k | £40k–£55k | £35k–£45k |
| Compliance AVP / Manager | £60k–£80k | £55k–£75k | £50k–£70k |
| Compliance VP / Senior Manager | £80k–£110k | £80k–£110k | £80k–£100k |
| Compliance Director | £120k–£180k | £120k–£160k | £100k–£150k |
| Head of Compliance | £150k–£250k | £140k–£250k | £120k–£200k |
| Global Head of Compliance | £200k+ | £200k+ | £150k+ |
Hedge funds and private equity salaries
| Job role | London |
|---|---|
| Compliance Assistant | £50k–£70k |
| Compliance AVP / Manager | £60k–£100k |
| Compliance VP / Senior Manager | £100k–£130k |
| Compliance Director | £140k–£180k |
| Head of Compliance | £150k–£300k |
| Global Head of Compliance | £300k+ |
Fintech/payments salaries
| Job role | London | South East | Regional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance Assistant | £35k–£55k | £40k–£55k | £30k–£50k |
| Compliance AVP / Manager | £50k–£80k | £50k–£80k | £40k–£60k |
| Compliance VP / Senior Manager | £80k–£140k | £80k–£140k | £60k–£95k |
| Compliance Director | £90k–£180k | £90k–£180k | £95k–£140k |
| Head of Compliance | £120k–£250k | £120k–£250k | £100k–£200k |
Brokerage salaries
| Job role | London | South East | Regional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance Assistant | £40k–£55k | £40k–£55k | £30k–£50k |
| Compliance AVP / Manager | £50k–£80k | £50k–£80k | £40k–£60k |
| Compliance VP / Senior Manager | £80k–£140k | £80k–£140k | £60k–£95k |
| Compliance Director | £90k–£180k | £90k–£180k | £95k–£140k |
| Head of Department | £180k–£250k | £150k–£250k | £140k–£200k |
| Global Head of Compliance | £160k–£350k | £160k–£350k | £160k–£350k |
Insurance salaries
| Job role | London | South East | Regional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance Assistant | £35k–£50k | £35k–£50k | £25k–£35k |
| Compliance AVP / Manager | £40k–£65k | £40k–£65k | £30k–£70k |
| Compliance VP / Senior Manager | £60k–£80k | £60k–£80k | £40k–£80k |
| Compliance Director | £80k–£120k | £80k–£120k | £70k–£120k |
| Head of Compliance | £100k–£200k | £100k–£200k | £100k–£200k |
| Global Head of Compliance | £200k–£400k | £180k+ | £180k+ |
Public practice salaries (Big 4)
| Job role | London | South East | Regional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance Associate | £30k–£40k | £30k–£50k | £20k–£40k |
| Compliance Assistant Manager | £45k–£60k | £45k–£60k | £45k–£60k |
| Compliance Manager | £60k–£80k | £60k–£80k | £55k–£75k |
| Compliance Senior Manager | £80k–£120k | £80k–£120k | £75k–£100k |
| Compliance Director | £100k–£200k | £100k–£180k | £90k–£140k |
| Partner | £200k+ | £200k+ | £150k+ |
Temporary / Interim rates (per day)
| Job role | London | South East | Regional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance Assistant | £250–£400 | £250–£350 | £200–£350 |
| Compliance AVP / Manager | £350–£550 | £250–£500 | £200–£450 |
| Compliance VP / Senior Manager | £450–£650 | £400–£600 | £400–£550 |
| Compliance Director / Project Consultant | £600–£1,000 | £550–£850 | £450–£750 |
| Head of Compliance / Project Lead | £1,000–£1,400 | £850–£1,000 | £550–£850 |
| Global Head of Compliance / Global Project Lead | £1,200–£2,800 | £750–£1,300 | £650–£1,200 |
Attract and retain the compliance professionals you need with Barclay Simpson
Barclay Simpson has specialised in recruiting compliance professionals since 2002. Our compliance practice has deep experience recruiting across regulatory compliance, advisory, assurance, regulatory affairs, policy and change.
When building a team to support you and negate any potential challenges posed by changing regulatory pressures, engaging a specialist recruiter will save time and money.
We can help you create a talent attraction strategy with competitive salary offerings or help you find a role that aligns with your skills and long-term career goals. If you are a compliance professional, we can also support you from interview through to onboarding in your new role.
Looking for your next move? Explore our latest compliance jobs. And if you’re hiring, learn more about our compliance recruitment services. Contact our experts today.
